...средства от пожертвований населения для пострадавших от теракта. Мы ничего не получили. Кроме этого оказывалась вещевая благотворительная помощь, поступала мебель, радиоаппаратура, бытовая техника — никто, ничего не получил из пострадавших. Многими организациями было выделено благотворительное жилье, но не все пострадавшие получили улучшение жилья.
2. Просим оказать содействие в переселении желающих по прежнему месту жительства в район «Печатники» без доплаты. Полный список желающих вернуться на прежнее место жительства находится у начальника департамента муниципального жилья — Росляковой В. А.
Николай Михайлович!
Просим Вас объединиться с депутатами МГД Лодко Т. М. и Драгуновой З. Ф., т. к. в этих районах проживают пострадавшие, желающие вернуться в район «Печатники».
Пужилкина Нина Константиновна, ул. Цимлянская д. 28 кв. 26.
№ 359-90-74.
Lawyer suffered for secret materials
Elena APASOVA
Mikhail Trepashkin worked in the security services for over 20 years. However, he gained fame in November 1998 thanks to a press conference organized by Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Litvinenko, an officer of the FSB's Directorate for the Analysis of Criminal Organizations (URPO). At that time, Litvinenko stated that, on the orders of his superiors, he had prepared an assassination attempt on Boris Berezovsky. Trepashkin attended the press conference as another intended victim. According to the lieutenant colonel, he had received an order to organize an attack on Mikhail Trepashkin as well. The reasons for this "contract" were not explained at the time. Back in 1996, Trepashkin left counterintelligence and took up legal practice.
Later, the former Chekist's name "surfaced" in early 2002 when he began collaborating with Sergei Kovalev's public commission investigating the apartment bombings in Moscow and Volgodonsk in the fall of 1999. In July 2002, during a well-known Moscow-London teleconference, Alexander Litvinenko handed over a statement from Achimez Gochiyayev to the commission members. According to the investigation, Gochiyayev was the organizer of these terrorist attacks. The militant claimed that he had rented the basements of the buildings in Moscow and Volgodonsk at the request of a school friend who "worked for the FSB." The public commission tasked Trepashkin with verifying this information, which, as the lawyer believes, served as the pretext for his criminal prosecution.
While in "Matrosskaya Tishina," Mikhail Trepashkin wrote several letters to the outside world. "RK" managed to review some of them. In them, the defendant-lawyer shares his vision of what happened. The basis for initiating the criminal case, in his opinion, was a letter addressed to the Chief Military Prosecutor from the FSB's Internal Security Directorate (USB), dated January 11, 2002. Mikhail Trepashkin assesses the information in it as slander and lies. In the USB letter, as Trepashkin wrote, it is reported that in London, representatives of the MI5 secret service met with Boris Berezovsky and Alexander Litvinenko. During this meeting, the former URPO lieutenant colonel reportedly provided British counterintelligence with secret information about FSB personnel, the procedure for making management decisions in Russian security agencies, etc. During this meeting, a "large-scale disinformation campaign against FSB activities" was planned, concerning the investigation of the apartment bombings in Moscow and Volgodonsk in the fall of 1999. According to the Chekist USB, Mikhail Trepashkin was precisely the one who was supposed to collect compromising material on the FSB while reviewing the materials of the criminal case on the apartment bombings. Indeed, lawyer Trepashkin had direct access to these materials, as he represented the interests of the Morozov sisters, who lost their mother in the terrorist attack. The FSB's Internal Security Directorate also assured the Chief Military Prosecutor that the lawyer kept secret documents at home, which he had stolen during his service. At one of the recent hearings, Trepashkin asked the court to request materials from the Internal Security Directorate confirming the above. The defendant's motion, as he wrote from the pre-trial detention center (SIZO), was attached to the case materials. Incidentally, the lawyer received his sentence, as already mentioned, for disclosing secret information, but without signs of high treason.