English translation

doc_015

Testimony Excerpts

Personal Circumstances and Allegations

  • Living Situation: The individual resides in a rented apartment where visitors are frequent, and in some instances, the person was left alone in the room.
  • Discovery of Cartridges: On several occasions during long trips (e.g., a family trip to Bryansk and Livadia), upon return, the individual noticed that someone had visited the apartment in their absence.
  • Possibilities for Cartridge Presence: The individual posits several possibilities regarding the presence of the cartridges:
    • They were planted by ill-wishers who subsequently informed the USB FSB RF (Internal Security Directorate of the FSB of the RF) about the cartridges.
    • They were planted by FSB RF agents who entered the home.
    • They resulted from an operational measure involving secret entry into the dwelling.
    • They were present during the search conducted on January 22, 2002, by a member of the operational-investigative group.
  • Evidence of Planting: The individual suggests that fingerprints of the persons involved could have been preserved on the cartridges.
  • Knowledge of Possessions: The selection of the planted cartridges suggests the perpetrators knew the individual previously owned a Makarov system pistol and a "Colt".
  • Hunting Rifle Matter: During service in the USB FSB RF, many were aware the individual was applying for a permit to purchase and carry a hunting rifle, but the matter was not finalized due to lack of time. Despite this, even a hunting rifle cartridge in a cardboard shell was planted.

Legal Proceedings and Search Irregularities

  • Investigation Type: Due to the perceived lack of complexity, the legislator indicates that an inquiry is being conducted under Part 1 of Art. 222 of the UK RF (Criminal Code of the RF), rather than a preliminary investigation (under Part 1 of Art. 126 of the UPK RSFSR - Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR).
  • Procedural Concern: The individual asserts that there is no reasoned instruction from the prosecutor mandating a preliminary investigation instead of an inquiry under Part 1 of Art. 222 of the UK RF, leading to the conclusion that the preliminary investigation is being conducted illegally.
  • Details of the Search:
    • Quantity and Type: 18 various cartridges, including blanks, were planted during or before the search.
    • Presentation: The cartridges were kept in a single cellophane bag but were "scattered" across several items in the search protocol to simulate a larger quantity.
    • Statement During Search: The individual was told in plain language, in the presence of witnesses and T.P. Semektina, that this was a "standard set for searching the apartments of former officers" to prevent complaints.
    • Seizure Timing: The bag containing the cartridges was seized from among office supplies almost immediately upon the entry of the investigative-operational group, suggesting prior knowledge of the cartridges' location or a deliberate trick by the group members.