Volgodonsk. 1999.

...they did not register it, thereby violating the law on charitable activities. Moreover, by law, a city duma cannot be the founder of a charitable organization.

We spoke out against this fund. In May 2000, we organized a hunger strike because the money intended for the people did not reach us, and if it was given to anyone, they were asked to share 'fifty-fifty' (people who had nothing at all agreed to this).

When we started fighting against the fund, there was still money there. Many complaints were written to the prosecutor's office. In 2000, we even turned to the control and auditing department under the president. We were received by the deputy head of the department.

After that, they started trying to drive us out of existence altogether: officials received enough to build themselves cottages, open pharmacies (aid also came in the form of medicines), and open stores ('KAMAZ' trucks with clothes came from Moscow). Everyone involved in our rehabilitation improved their well-being. The city duma and the city health department underwent European-style renovations.

An unidentified official from the Volgodonsk city health department commented on this as follows:
— Funds did not pass through the health department. We received an ultrasound machine from the Soros Foundation — it's impossible to misappropriate it. The medicines that arrived were not processed through the city health department — they passed through state pharmacies with invoices. Then they went to medical institutions. We were repeatedly checked by commissions and they found nothing reprehensible...

The same will be said in the mayor's office, in the city duma, and in the prosecutor's office... This is all, of course, wonderful. But where is the money for the victims?

Lyudmila Dubinskaya: 'In the end, the court did recognize the illegality of the fund's creation. Now it is being liquidated, but where is the money? And we started having serious problems when we turned to the Prosecutor General's Office...'

The state from... to the victims from...

Let's compare the experience of our country (which, as the government boasts, has a giant gold and foreign exchange reserve and a constantly replenished stabilization fund of billions of dollars) with what is happening in the West.

Firstly, in many countries that have experienced terrorist acts, special insurance funds with state participation operate. Such a fund in France, for example, appeared in the 80s of the last century. And in 1990, the French parliament passed a law equating victims of terrorist attacks with victims of war. Such funds also exist in Spain and the United Kingdom.

...this cannot compensate for or repair the damage.' How to evaluate this? The accents were placed by the Moscow City [Court], and then...

...openly mocking people who lost their health, relatives, and loved ones.

To all this already...

EXPLOSION

Explosion in... 1999. State... us from terror... Volgodonsk. 1999.

"...damage cannot be compensated or fixed by this." How to evaluate it? The accents were set by the Moscow City Court, and then by the Supreme Court — four years later, the people of Volgodonsk heard the verdict: "Recover from the convicted." It sounds something like: "You'll get it from Pushkin" [a Russian idiom meaning "you'll get nothing"].

In their cassation appeal, the victims from Volgodonsk wrote: "With such compensation... the lack of equality between the rights of victims of a terrorist attack and government officials, for whom moral damage is calculated by courts using different standards and reaches many millions of rubles, is confirmed."

The authorities are doing everything to insure themselves against lawsuits. The executive branch claims that there was and is no war in the Caucasus, and therefore all terrorist attacks are not a consequence of incompetent policy, but almost accidents. The legislature does not want to pass a law "On Victims of Terrorist Attacks," although the need for it is obvious. The judicial branch makes decisions that run counter to the law, openly mocking people who have lost their health, relatives, and loved ones. Everyone has already gotten used to all this.

But even charitable aid — not state, but private — dissolves in unknown "black holes."

Charity Volgodonsk-style

Lyudmila Dubinskaya, a victim of the terrorist attack in Volgodonsk:

• When the terrorist attack happened, the whole country and foreign countries responded to our grief. Charitable funds were collected, which, according to our data, amount to 200 million rubles.
• These funds first went to the city administration's account, but the Ministry of Justice stated that this was illegal and a fund had to be created, as the victims were the legal owners of the money.
• After that, the city duma created a fund headed by Eduard Rykov, the former chairman of the city duma.
• In the Ministry of Justice, his... [text missing] ...increased their well-being.
• In the city duma, in the city health department, they did European-style renovations.

An unidentified official of the Volgodonsk city health department commented on it this way:

• Funds did not pass through the health department. We received an ultrasound machine from the Soros Foundation — it's impossible to misappropriate it.
• The medicines that arrived, we didn't pass through the city health department — they went through invoices through state pharmacies. Then they went to medical institutions.
• We were repeatedly checked by commissions and they found nothing reprehensible...
• They will tell you the same thing in the mayor's office, and in the city duma, and in the prosecutor's office... This is all, of course, wonderful. But where is the money for the victims?

Lyudmila Dubinskaya: "In the end, the court did recognize the illegality of creating the fund. Now it is being liquidated, but where is the money? And we started having serious problems when we turned to the Prosecutor General's Office about this. They started calling Irina Polyanskaya at home: they told her children that if their mother didn't stop fighting for her rights, she wouldn't live long. We had to be extremely careful: we tried not to go out in the evening, to stick together, not to open doors until we heard a pre-arranged knock. Once I broke this rule. My son didn't stay home that night. At half past four in the morning, the doorbell rang. I jumped up, heard from behind the door: "Mom, open up." Half-asleep, I opened it immediately. I saw two men on the doorstep. I received a sharp blow to the head and a blow to the groin. Losing consciousness, I heard: "If you don't shut your mouth, we'll kill you." The criminal case about this assassination attempt was hushed up." Just as, after some time, everything else was hushed up...

Anna KOGAN, Igor KOVALEVSKY

Israel's Law on Victims of Terrorist Attacks

In Israel, a law on victims of terrorist attacks appeared in 1970. It applies not only to Israelis but also to foreigners. The status of victims is largely equated to the status of military personnel. The law gives a person the opportunity to receive necessary medical care free of charge throughout the entire period of treatment; in addition, compensation in the amount of three average salaries is paid.

If, after completing the rehabilitation course, a person is still unable to work, they have the right to apply to a state medical commission, which will determine the degree of disability. In case of total loss of work capacity...

The number of victims in Volgodonsk is growing: suicides and beatings [fragment]