Our Version

One can have different attitudes towards this story and the FSB's investigative materials. As they say, believe it or not. The trial of Anatoly Viktorovich Mylnikov will take place in a month. Let's hope it will be fair. However, in this whole dark story, there are a number of extremely curious questions to which we have not been able to get answers.

It is quite likely that the threats of the "volunteers" were not such a bluff as the FSB thought. True, certain persons interested in the release of Natalya Zander did not blow anyone up, but simply very competently used the current situation. How else to explain the amazing coincidences between the appeal sent to the Prosecutor General's Office and the events that followed? It turns out that they knew about the upcoming explosions in Moscow. From where?

The strange position of the FSB is also surprising. Why, having such important evidence, did the FSB begin to develop exclusively the "Caucasian trace" of these terrorist attacks? Not a word was said about the "volunteers". Why didn't the FSB bother to check the actually existing organization "Volunteers of Russia"? Maybe they investigated to order? And finally, why immediately after the first terrorist attack did the FSB not take emergency measures to search for the authors of the appeal: after all, they could at least give important testimony. They were "found" only last winter. When the film "FSB Blows Up Russia" was released.