Ruling

The legal classification of the acts committed by the convict Mylnikov under Art. 205 Part 1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is correct.

The punishment for Mylnikov was assigned in accordance with the requirements of the law.

Therefore, the cassation appeal is not subject to satisfaction.

Based on the foregoing and guided by Articles 377, 378, and 388 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, the judicial collegium ruled:

• To leave the sentence of the Moscow City Court dated August 16, 2002, regarding Anatoly Viktorovich Mylnikov unchanged, and the cassation appeal - without satisfaction.

Presiding [Signature]
Judges [Signatures]
TRUE COPY: Judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation [Signature]

Note: the case was considered under the chairmanship of Judge Komarova.

The measure of restraint regarding the convict A.V. Mylnikov until the pronouncement of the sentence was chosen in the form of detention/custody.

[Stamp: MOSCOW CITY COURT]
[Stamp: COPY]

5-002-229

COPIES OF THE RULING SENT TO:
[Handwritten notes: to SIZO-1, to special department, to SIZO-3, Case sent on 23.10.02 to Moscow City Court]

sewn and numbered on [?] pages

Judge:
Secretary: